Former Aviation Minister, Femi Fani-Kayode, has vehemently refuted the claims made by the Ohanaeze President-General, Chief Emmanuel Iwuanyanwu, regarding the purported developmental role of Igbos in transforming Lagos State from a swamp to a mega city.
Characterizing Iwuanyanwu’s assertions as a specious lie and disingenuous nonsense, Fani-Kayode plunged into the discourse, challenging the narrative put forth by the Ohanaeze leader.
Iwuanyanwu had contended that Igbos played a pivotal role as “pioneers” and “heroes” in shaping modern Lagos State, making previously swampy areas habitable.
Dismissing these assertions with a strong rebuttal, the All Progressives Congress (APC) chieftain stood firm in his conviction that Lagos State was never a slum before the arrival of the Igbos.
Fani-Kayode, known for his outspoken views, took to the platform to express his disagreement with Iwuanyanwu’s historical account.
In a post on X, Fani-Kayode stated, “This is nothing but a specious and self-serving LIE. It can best be described as disingenuous nonsense!”
He went on to counter several points, emphasizing that Yorubas are not “political rascals,” Lagos is not a “no man’s land,” and Binis did not “found Lagos.”
Additionally, he refuted the notion that Lagos was a “slum before the Igbos got there,” cautioning against historical revisionism.
The exchange underscores the complexity of narratives surrounding the history and development of Lagos State, a bustling metropolis known for its economic significance and cultural diversity.
The clash of perspectives between Fani-Kayode and Iwuanyanwu reflects the broader debates about identity, historical contributions, and the shared heritage of different ethnic groups in Nigeria.
Lagos, often referred to as the economic heartbeat of Nigeria, has a rich and dynamic history shaped by the interactions of various communities.
As these divergent narratives unfold, they bring to the forefront the need for nuanced discussions that acknowledge the contributions of multiple ethnic groups in the development of this vibrant state.
The dialogue spurred by Fani-Kayode’s rejection of Iwuanyanwu’s claims invites a deeper exploration of historical truths and a reevaluation of the narratives that define our understanding of the past.
In a nation characterized by its diversity, such discussions contribute to a more comprehensive and inclusive appreciation of the multifaceted heritage that shapes the complex tapestry of Nigeria.
