In a recent turn of events, the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) of Abuja has become a focal point of heated controversy, sparked by the outspoken Islamic cleric, Sheikh Ahmad Gumi.
Gumi’s assertion that Abuja is part of northern Nigeria and should be administered by a Muslim has ignited debates among various ethnic groups in the country.
According to Gumi and his supporters, the appointment of former Rivers State governor, Nyesom Wike, as the Minister of FCT by President Bola Tinubu was a deviation from the tradition of appointing northerners to the position.
Since the creation of the FCT in February 1976, the majority of substantive ministers have been northerners, with Wike being only the second southerner to hold the position.
Gumi criticized Wike for meeting with the Israeli Ambassador to Nigeria, accusing him of plans to turn Abuja into Tel Aviv, the capital of Israel, and endangering Muslims.
In response, Wike clarified that the meeting was focused on agricultural partnerships for the benefit of FCT farmers, dismissing accusations of bias in diplomatic relations.
The constitutional provisions regarding the FCT’s ownership and status are clear, stating that it belongs to the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and Abuja is the capital of the federation.
Despite Wike’s efforts to bring order to the city, including demolishing illegal structures and revoking properties, Gumi’s provocative statements have drawn condemnation from various quarters.
Groups such as the Pan Niger Delta Forum (PANDEF) and the Middle Belt Forum (MBF) have denounced Gumi’s views as divisive and irresponsible.
PANDEF emphasized that Abuja is the Federal Capital Territory of Nigeria, developed with the resources of the Niger Delta region.
MBF rejected the notion that the FCT minister must be a northerner, asserting that all Nigerians have equal rights in the capital.
The ongoing debate raises questions about the original intent behind Abuja’s creation.
General Murtala Muhammed, who initiated the move, emphasized that Abuja would “belong to all Nigerians” as a symbol of unity.
However, recent sentiments and controversies suggest a departure from this vision.
As Nigeria grapples with issues of regionalism and religious considerations, the fate of Abuja as a unifying capital remains uncertain.
Gumi’s statements have underscored the need for a broader dialogue on the inclusive nature of the FCT and the principles upon which it was established.
