In a legal showdown, renowned Afrobeats singer Davido has vehemently contested the N2.3 billion breach of contract suit lodged against him by Amaju Pinnick, the Chairman of Brownhill Investments Company Limited and former president of the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF).
The lawsuit, filed on October 31, alleges that Davido reneged on an agreement to perform at the 19th edition of the ‘Warri Again’ event on October 6, 2023.
According to DAILY POST, Pinnick claims that Davido failed to make an appearance at the event despite receiving a substantial payment of $94,500.
In response, Davido, represented by his legal team led by Norrison Quakers (SAN), opted to challenge the jurisdiction of the Delta State High Court in Effurun where the case is being heard.
The crux of Davido’s argument revolves around the nature of the dispute.
He contends that the matter should be treated as a debt recovery case, emphasizing that Pinnick ought to have issued a demand letter before resorting to legal action.
This strategic move by Davido’s legal team seeks to redefine the narrative and procedural aspects of the lawsuit.
Furthermore, the singer raised objections concerning the authenticity of the contractual representative involved.
Davido denied that Sosoberokon, the individual who signed the contract on his behalf, held the status of an authorized agent.
This challenge adds a layer of complexity to the case, questioning the legitimacy of the agreement itself.
Additionally, Davido disputed Pinnick’s characterization of the payment.
Contrary to the claim that the funds were designated for a live performance, Davido argued that they were intended for promotional services.
This divergence in interpretation further underscores the intricacies of the contractual arrangements and the varied perspectives of the involved parties.
As the legal drama unfolds, the Delta State High Court in Effurun has set the stage for a crucial ruling on the preliminary objections filed by both parties.
The court, cognizant of the significance of the issues raised, has scheduled the next hearing for December 14, 2023.
Until then, the intricacies of this high-profile case will continue to captivate the attention of legal experts, entertainment enthusiasts, and the public at large.
The outcome holds the potential to reshape the landscape of contractual disputes in the entertainment industry.
